Next Reviews

The profile carries a platform verification badge, but user reputation is effectively zero: there is one review. Five out of five is one person's view of one cheat out of five, not a track record. Buyers of the Tarkov, DayZ and ARK products have written nothing at all. The usual new-supplier risk applies: the first test is on you.

This is not a cheap line-up. The most affordable item is the Lite build for Escape From Tarkov at three hundred and forty-nine roubles. The DayZ and War Thunder cheats are five hundred and nineteen each, the full Tarkov version is five hundred and ninety-nine, and the ARK: Survival Ascended cheat tops the range at six hundred and eighty-nine.

There is no data. The only review covers War Thunder, and the buyer says he played safely without naming a timeframe or an anti-cheat. Not a single ban report exists on the profile — nor any confirmation of the opposite. The question stays open: no verifiable detection history has been accumulated for this provider yet.

Four titles: Escape From Tarkov, DayZ, War Thunder and ARK: Survival Ascended. Tarkov has two versions, Pro and Lite; the other games get one product each. There is no HWID spoofer in the range, so if you are hardware-banned you will need to buy one from a different supplier.

The only confirmable difference is price: Pro costs five hundred and ninety-nine roubles, Lite three hundred and forty-nine. The names imply Lite is cut down, but exactly what was removed is not stated in the profile data, and we will not invent it. Check the individual product page before you buy either version.

The comparison writes itself: the single Next review mentions Mason Internal — better in War Thunder tank battles, in that buyer's view, while Next wins in the air. Beyond that the scale differs: Mason spans dozens of games with thirty-six reviews, Next has five products and one review. Next is also the pricier of the two.